As I reflect on the topic of technology and collaboration in
the classroom, I am drawn to thoughts of my junior year of high school. I took
AP English, which I suppose is the closest thing that I’ve taken to the English
1301 classes that our students are taking. We had an excellent teacher, one I
still remember as having an impact on my later decision to study Englsih. For
that class, we were assigned the infamous Movie Project.
This was a
collaborative project. We were put into groups of eight, and then given four
options of classic movies to adopt into the present day. This involved writing
a new screenplay, as well as filming, acting, and editing all ourselves (my
group did an adaptation of Macbeth).
It was an
extremely stressful project, as perhaps you can imagine. However, I must admit
that I did learn a lot more than I would have by working on a simple essay. How
many people can say they put together a fifty minute movie when they were
seventeen years old?
Thinking about
my own syllabus, I can’t justify putting my freshmen through the trauma of
being put in a group with seven people they probably don’t know. I like the
idea of making a project involving a video, however. The Texas Tech Library has
video cameras that are available for students to check out for forty-eight
hours at a time, so access to technology shouldn’t be a problem even for students
that might possibly not have video cameras on their phones.
Since in
undergraduate classes it’s common not to really know your fellow classmates, I
think I would assign them to groups of four and set them about the task of making
a short film. I think it would be interesting to give them a specific time
frame that their movie must fit within, maybe either exactly three or exactly
four minutes (give or take five seconds). Like with the photo essays we’ve been
discussing, I think that giving specific parameters will encourage students to
be intentional in their choices about what to include or exclude.
As far as
prompts, I wouldn’t be too specific. I think that simply telling a story will
be the main point of the assignment. Does it have a beginning, a middle, and an
end? By the end of the video is something concrete different than it was at the
beginning? Is the tension, climax, character development? Granted, that’s a lot
to expect from a short video, but that’s the art of it.
Alternatively,
I might give students the option of making their video persuasive, rather than
creative, in which case I would evaluate whether or not they were able to
effectively present and defend their argument within the time constraints.
Regardless of
the prompt followed, I would require each student to appear in the video, even
if just for a few seconds. I would also require each student to write up a
brief statement, maybe 250 words, explaining the part that they played in
bringing the project to completion. In that way I would assure fairness of
grading and prevent any students from profiting by slacking off while others
did the work.
A movie project sounds really unique to me, Mary. It would make some good use of utilities like the video cameras available at the Tech library while creating a group project where students can work together. The experience, though awkward at first, would be helpful in gaining a sense of connectivity among undergraduates that, like you said, doesn't even surface that much in the first year writing classes that we have here on campus.
ReplyDeleteThe idea of a movie project is intriguing. I especially like how the time limit would force the students to be extremely deliberate in their choices. Such deliberate planning could then easily be connected to an author's rhetorical choices. I might even suggest playing the exceptionally well done videos in class and having students analyze them as an exercise in identifying rhetorical choices.
ReplyDeleteHave you had a chance to review others' syllabi yet? I'm going to make them available through our class site soon. I wonder if reviewing what your peers have to say about syllabi might be useful for your own thinking, too.
ReplyDelete